Reproductive Medicine

Reproductive Medicine

By: Anonymous
E-mail: [email protected]

Reproductive Medicine on the Ethical Frontier � I love kids and I always wanted to have them. They said they�d tried it in sheep and it worked.� Stacie McBain was recently diagnosed with cancer at the age of 20. Doctors told her that the treatment she would undergo will ultimately leave her infertile. In light of this devastating news was an experimental procedure that had given Stacie the chance to become a mother. Her wish was no longer in the hands of God, but in the technology discovered by a doctor. Such experimental operations have occurred across the globe for over a decade, placing fertility procedures �in the eye of an ethical storm� (Meyer 94). The question remains are doctors playing God, or just giving infertile patients their wish to become parents? The advances in science and medicine have led to the increase in ethical disputes. For many couples desperate to have children, fertility procedures are a momentous opportunity, which come with a high price. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, �in 1994, the fertility industry cost the US Health-care system between $60,000 and $110,000 for each successful pregnancy.� Not only are these operations expensive, but also tantalizing and to some immoral. �We often get ahead of ourselves in technologically�And the ethics; we�re still wrestling with those kinds of questions� (Silverman). In-vitro fertilization, artificial insemination, and fertility drugs are all available prospects for the infertile couple, today. The Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society states �[ Artificial insemination by donor ] may be the best solution to overcome the infertile couple�s inability to have their own�child.� In-vitro fertilization, otherwise known as test-tube babies, is a process in which doctors remove ovaries and prepare them in a petri dish along with the male�s sperm to ensure pregnancy. This process begins with the female submitting to a two-week regimen of daily drug injections, tedious blood shots, and a number of ultrasound examinations. Although they are well informed of the price tag, risks, and effects of these procedures, �reproductive medicine is now a $1 billion-a-year industry that accounts for some 23,000 live births a year in the U.S. alone (Wulf). With these experimental procedures comes the risk of error by surgeons. Donna Fasano of New York was one victim in an infertility treatment mix-up that impregnated her with two embryos; one with her egg and husband�s sperm, and one with an African American�s DNA. Their fertility specialist notified the Fasono�s of the mistake one week into the pregnancy, and Donna continued to carry both embryos to full term, giving birth to twin boys, one white and one black, in December of 1999. Deborah and Robert Rogers were also patients at the same clinic, and believe the black child is their son. The boys are surrounded by legal and ethical disputes; the Rogers demanding that they are the biological parents and the Fasanos insisting that the boys should not be separated. Who are the real...

To view the complete essay, you be registered.