Psychology comparison
Psychology comparisonPsychology comparison
The world, today, is exposed to a plethora of information, substantiated or not. Since newspapers and other secondary source material is responsible for relaying information to much of the population it is important to understand and realize the limitations of the medium. Their need to appeal to the general population and their wide dispersal would make them more likely to incorporate entertainment value versus objectively reported facts. Therefore it is imperative to question and compare them with the primary sources they report on. A fairly recent study was done on the effects of Internet use. The researchers report was published as was a secondary article on the findings. By comparing these two the limitations of the secondary source can be exposed and used as an example for other such circumstances.
The secondary-source article comes from the August 30, 1998 edition of the New York Times. Written by Amy Harmon, the report is titled �Researchers Find Sad Lonely World in Cyberspace.� The article goes on to explain that researchers at Carnegie Mellon University completed a study (later identified as the �Homenet� study) that examines the social and psychological effects of Internet use in the home. What they found, the report states, is that the initial depression and loneliness of the participants in the study did not increase use on the Internet. However, citing the researchers, the article states; �Internet use itself appeared to cause a decline in psychological well-being.�
After stating this theoretical finding the article lists the cost of the project ($1.5 million) and the organizations who sponsored it (many being technology companies). The article notes that both these organizations and the research team were �shocked� by the findings, because the Internet has been viewed by many as having actively social uses. Harmon goes on to compare the Internet to the �passive� medium of television. She states that with these new findings the suggestion is made that the Internet is no healthier than older forms of mass media. She claims that these findings raise �troubling questions� about the quality of social interaction on the Internet. The report describes how participants in this study primarily used the social features of the Internet (e-mail and chat rooms). However, the article states, participants; �reported a decline in interaction with family members and a reduction in their circles of friends that directly corresponds to the amount of time they spent online.�
The article continues on to briefly describe the methods of the research. The sample included 169 participants from the Pittsburgh area. Half were followed through two years of Internet use, the other half was monitored through one year. Refering to the data compiled, Harmon quotes the main researcher Robert Kraut. He calls the data �statistically significant� and hypothesizes that the shallow relationships built on-line lead to a decline in feelings of connection to other people....
To view the complete essay, you be registered.