Aliens or Gods
Aliens or GodsWhen I had begun creating this research paper the question that was intriguing me was why did the human society in the last couple of hundreds years suddenly (relatively) changed the foundations of it's thought. This being evident in the way people started to interpret certain incidents, these being the appearance of Unidentified Flying Objects. Now whether these objects are really aliens, is a very good question, but I would have you believe that why is it that people have started to interpret these flying objects as aliens in the last sixty years or so is a more important one. Some people as the counter argument would have you believe though that these craft have only been around for the last couple of hundreds of years, but this being completely incorrect and they not even realizing it, is something that must be corrected. Actually these things have been in a different name here from the beginning of human civilization and have even perhaps begun it, as they were called gods. Notice that I am a true believer in aliens and not through faith but basically through the simple principle, that no matter how disturbing something is, if so many people believe in it and not gaining anything from that belief, it must be true. Yet this is only something I wish to deal with in order that I could compare the situation today with that of two thousand years ago and more, much more, since there are people who have already proposed and practically proved these ideas, and much better than I ever could by the way. Yet in order to even begin answering my original question, which although seemingly easy, is much deeper than one might imagine, I must express and explain and support these ideas.
The appearance of Homo sapiens 200,000 years ago defies all the principles of evolutionary theory, while the Biblical account of divine creation defies the laws of physics. And yet we are here and although that fact must be explained it isn't completely relevant to the argument that I am trying to make. When I say that the appearance of Homo sapiens defies all the principles of evolution I am perhaps exaggerating a bit. It simply stretches the theory up to its breaking point and just a little bit beyond it. The theory is perfectly valid for the rest of the animal kingdom, but when it encounters the question of man, a lot of inventiveness is required to get rid of some of the inconsistencies and some are actually unexplainable. The basics of the evolutionary theory are that through random mutations, which just happen to suit the environment, the mutation is given an advantage over the rest of his species and therefore is statistically more likely to survive and propagate, and therefore spread the specific trait. So basically our evolution must be a series of `successful mistakes`. Because this process is extremely random and the rate of mutation really slow, it...
To view the complete essay, you be registered.